The Fat Burner
Articles Mini-Course Home Store Resources Contact Privacy
7th October 2007

NOT Burning Fat:
Flab Jab - Anti-Fat Shots

By Philip Edwards

Known as the Flab Jab in the U.K., this phenomenon has become one of the fastest growing and most controversial new cosmetic medical procedures to get rid of those unsightly jelly rolls and fat spots that seem to linger no matter what people try to get rid of them.

Injections of fat-dissolving compounds are a practice that science doesn't yet back for safety or effectiveness - but when has that stopped people in the past?

Doctors warn that this so called “off-brand” use of a medication for reducing fatty plaque deposits in coronary arteries is not approved as a liposuction replacement - which is essentially what it’s being used for.

Actually, these shots - which are injected into the subcutaneous tissues that contain most of the body’s fat cells - will not work on people who are considered obese, i.e. those that have a body fat level of 30% or more. Rather, they are used by plastic surgeons to spot reduce areas where fat seems to build up – the neck, eye lids, knees, stomach and love handles.

The procedure is very simple – the patient goes in and receives a series of injections in the area they wish to shrink. Each injection can cost anywhere from $30 in third-world clinics to $400 in upscale cosmetic surgery parlors in major U.S. cities.

A number of injections are needed to get the job done depending on the area involved and the amount of fat. Doctors say that two to four treatments at six to eight week intervals are enough to see results.

So while it’s less than half as expensive as liposuction –a surgical procedure involving a vacuuming away of the fat cells in the affected area – it’s still no bargain.

Proponents say it much safer since no general anesthesia is required – it’s an outpatient procedure. They also say recovery is much faster and entails less pain.

Made from soy beans, the active ingredient – a fat-dissolving chemical phosphatidylcholine (PPT) - speeds up the body’s natural metabolic process to burn off fat cells in a particular area which is then supposedly reabsorbed by the body.

Some add that messaging the area is important to spread the PPT throughout the affected area and get the best results from each treatment.

Invented by a dermatologist in Brazil where the procedure has been done more than 25,000 times with no reported ill-effects, it’s becoming more and more popular in the Northern Hemisphere – new clinics are popping up right and left as cosmetic surgeons cater to a worldwide fat epidemic, large amounts of loose cash and the need to look like Paris Hilton in order to gain social acceptance.

But opponents warn that the procedure shouldn’t be seen as a solution for overweight and obese people because they could easily see the flab return and doctors’ stress this treatment is for people who have done everything else to lose weight - like diet and exercise.

In fact, the fat removal mechanism is poorly understood and doctors are not sure where the removed fat finally ends up. It may just become redistributed to other areas of body.

Scientific studies are also conspicuously absent and the neither the FDA nor major pharmaceutical companies certify its use.

Even insurance groups are getting into the act and, in many areas, will not insure doctors who perform this procedure making it very dangerous for them to use in case of complications.

Sherry Williams, deputy director of policy at the Medical Protection Society in the UK, said they decided to act on the widespread availability of cosmetic Lipostabil. “This is the first time we have withdrawn benefits in this way,” Dr Williams said. “Our concern was that it was being used subcutaneously and the manufacturer recommended that it shouldn’t.”









Google


Articles

Articles Index





Copyright 2007 The Fat Burner